Syria's salvation is through reform
By Ammar Abdulhamid
Special to The Daily Star
Saturday, February 12, 2005
Despite the current mood of optimism prevailing in Syria due to the
success of President Bashar Assad's recent visit to Moscow, the country
continues to face a very serious situation because of its poor relations
with the United States and the international community. The Bush
administration still denounces Damascus for what it says is Syrian
meddling in Iraq; and the international community as a whole continues
to deride Syria's overt and well-documented interference in Lebanese
affairs.
For this reason, the U.S. is unlikely to relax
its pressures on the Syrian regime anytime soon. Instead of throwing
carrots in its direction, the Americans seem more interested in putting
the Assad regime on hold, letting it simmer in its own juices in
preparation for a new round of international pressures.
The association agreement that Syria and the
European Union are expected to sign in May will not be enough to get the
regime off the hook. Many European countries, especially France, have
been pushing Damascus for months to withdraw its troops from Lebanon in
compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 1559. President Jacques
Chirac reiterated this demand earlier this week in Paris, in the company
of U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
So what options does the Syrian regime have? How
can the regime normalize its strained relations with the U.S., the EU
and the international community?
Contrary to what many members of the political
class think, the only answer is domestic political reform. During the
past few months of international criticism and pressure, the regime has
attempted to address the situation purely as a foreign policy matter.
Damascus has avoided meeting American demands, and when it saw that
these demands deprived it of potential pressure cards to use against
Israel, it issued statements indicating a desire to jumpstart
Syrian-Israeli negotiations - to no avail. The road to Washington does
not pass through Israel, as the Syrian regime had hoped. It is the other
way around: Syria's road to salvation goes through Washington.
However, appeasing an unrelenting Bush
administration now requires more innovation and boldness. It also
requires introspection, something that has been missing from the Syrian
scene for the past four years, after Assad took office amid rising
expectations for change. There are still quite a few members of the
political elite who continue to have problems accepting that political
reform represents a preferable way out of the present imbroglio and can
pave the way for international legitimacy - over and above the good it
would do for the regime's domestic credibility. The inability to grasp
this simple fact is disheartening, but, worse, it also poses an
existential threat today to both regime and country.
Syria's only real card now is a credible process
of political reform. This means not only introducing new reformists into
the higher ranks of the Baath Party (as the party seems poised to do
soon), it should also involve such "radical" steps as establishing a
dialogue with opposition parties and dissidents inside and outside the
country, freeing all political prisoners, lifting the state of
emergency, and adopting a national reconciliation pact that can
accommodate Syria's diverse ethnic, religious and political groups. A
new Constitution and a new modus vivendi are in order here.
Only such a process would enable the Syrian
regime to break out of its isolation, regain international legitimacy
and become an active participant in the emerging order in the Middle
East. The Europeans will most assuredly support such a process if it is
authentic enough.
Holding talks with a Syria that is democratizing
could be too tempting to ignore for the Israelis. It would also give the
Syrian government a critical push, buttressing its call for a full
return of the occupied Golan Heights. This would also go a long way
toward reversing the current trend observed in recent opinion polls in
Israel showing a lack of popular support there for the idea.
Even the Bush administration, no matter how eager
it is to find scapegoats for its current mess in Iraq, would find it
hard to oppose a Syrian regime that has embraced Washington's rhetoric
of reform and democratization. In fact, the U.S. might be tempted to use
such a transformation to its advantage, highlighting it as a byproduct
of its Middle Eastern policies. The administration could then point to
Syria, not Iraq, as the model for the kind of "velvet transformation" it
wants to see in the region.
Internal political reform may do more than help
the Syrian regime extract itself from its internal and external
predicaments and pull the rug out from under those interfering in
domestic Syrian affairs. It would also help transform Syria, again, into
a major regional player and, once comprehensive economic reforms are
adopted, into a magnet for foreign investment. This would create a
win-win solution for all those inside Syria and those outside observing
its behavior. But do Syria's current leaders have enough foresight and
wisdom to grasp this?
Ammar
Abdulhamid is a
Syrian novelist and social analyst based in Damascus, and is coordinator
of the Tharwa Project, a program that seeks to bring greater awareness
of the living conditions of minority groups in the Arab world. He is
currently facing a travel ban imposed by Syria's political security
directorate. He wrote this commentary for
THE DAILY STAR.
|